HKSE: 9988_HK - Alibaba Group Holding Limited

Yield per half year: -17.98%
Sector: Consumer Cyclical

Download the report: word Word , pdf PDF

1. Summary

Advantages

  • Positive review The stock's return over the last year (-20.49%) is higher than the sector average (-99.97%).
  • Positive review Current debt level 10.32% is below 100% and has decreased over 5 years from 17.51%.

Disadvantages

  • Negative review Price (71.6 HK$) is higher than fair price (31.89 HK$)
  • Negative review Dividends (1.3584%) are below the sector average (1.9593%).
  • Negative review The company's current efficiency (ROE=7.44%) is lower than the sector average (ROE=10.01%)

2. Share price and performance

2.1. Share price

2.2. News

2.3. Market efficiency

Alibaba Group Holding Limited Consumer Cyclical Index
7 days 3.3% -99.8% -3.1%
90 days -5.8% -100% -2.3%
1 year -20.5% -100% 42%

Positive review 9988_HK vs Sector: Alibaba Group Holding Limited has outperformed the "Consumer Cyclical" sector by 79.49% over the past year.

Negative review 9988_HK vs Market: Alibaba Group Holding Limited has significantly underperformed the market by -62.52% over the past year.

Positive review Stable price: 9988_HK is not significantly more volatile than the rest of the market on "Гонконгская фондовая биржа" over the last 3 months, with typical variations of +/- 5% per week.

Long period: 9988_HK with weekly volatility of -0.394% over the past year.

3. Summary of the report

3.1. General

P/E: 20.89
P/S: 1.7435

3.2. Revenue

EPS 3.83
ROE 7.44%
ROA 4.21%
ROIC 0%
Ebitda margin 13.78%

4. Fundamental Analysis

4.1. Stock price and price forecast

The fair price is calculated taking into account the Central Bank refinancing rate and earnings per share (EPS)

Negative review company.analysis.fundamental.minus11_title: The current price (71.6 HK$) is higher than the fair price (31.89 HK$).

Negative review Price is higher than fair: The current price (71.6 HK$) is 55.5% higher than the fair price.

4.2. P/E

Positive review P/E vs Sector: The company's P/E (20.89) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (71.52).

Positive review P/E vs Market: The company's P/E (20.89) is lower than that of the market as a whole (53.03).

4.2.1 P/E Similar companies

4.3. P/BV

Positive review P/BV vs Sector: The company's P/BV (1.5153) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (3.39).

Positive review P/BV vs Market: The company's P/BV (1.5153) is lower than that of the market as a whole (2.31).

4.3.1 P/BV Similar companies

4.4. P/S

Positive review P/S vs Sector: The company's P/S indicator (1.7435) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (2.85).

Positive review P/S vs Market: The company's P/S indicator (1.7435) is lower than that of the market as a whole (5.64).

4.4.1 P/S Similar companies

4.5. EV/Ebitda

Negative review EV/Ebitda vs Sector: The company's EV/Ebitda (10.28) is higher than that of the sector as a whole (8).

Positive review EV/Ebitda vs Market: The company's EV/Ebitda (10.28) is lower than that of the market as a whole (10.37).


5. Profitability

5.1. Profitability and revenue

5.2. Earnings per share - EPS

5.3. Past profitability Ebitda

Negative review Yield Trend: Negative and has fallen by -2.09% over the last 5 years.

Positive review Accelerating profitability: The return for the last year (139.94%) exceeds the average return for 5 years (-2.09%).

Positive review Profitability vs Sector: The return for the last year (139.94%) exceeds the return for the sector (-26.84%).

5.4. ROE

Negative review ROE vs Sector: The company's ROE (7.44%) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (10.01%).

Positive review ROE vs Market: The company's ROE (7.44%) is higher than that of the market as a whole (5.81%).

5.5. ROA

Negative review ROA vs Sector: The company's ROA (4.21%) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (5.14%).

Positive review ROA vs Market: The company's ROA (4.21%) is higher than that of the market as a whole (2.3%).

5.6. ROIC

Negative review ROIC vs Sector: The company's ROIC (0%) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (5.84%).

Negative review ROIC vs Market: The company's ROIC (0%) is lower than that of the market as a whole (0%).

6. Finance

6.1. Assets and debt

Positive review Debt level: (10.32%) is quite low in relation to assets.

Positive review Debt reduction: over 5 years, the debt has decreased from 17.51% to 10.32%.

Negative review Excess of debt: The debt is not covered by net income, percentage 249.45%.

6.2. Profit growth and share price

7. Dividends

7.1. Dividend yield vs Market

Negative review Low yield: The dividend yield of the company 1.3584% is below the average for the sector '1.9593%.

7.2. Stability and increase in payments

Positive review Dividend stability: The company's dividend yield 1.3584% has been steadily paid over the past 7 years, DSI=1.

Negative review Weak dividend growth: The company's dividend yield 1.3584% has been growing weakly or stagnant over the past 5 years. Growth over only 0 years.

7.3. Payout percentage

Negative review Dividend Coverage: Current payments from income (0%) are at an uncomfortable level.

8. Insider trades

8.1. Insider trading

Positive review Insider Buying Exceeds insider sales by 100% over the last 3 months.

8.2. Latest transactions

No insider transactions have been recorded yet

9. Stocks forum Alibaba Group Holding Limited

9.1. Latest comments

26 June 11:57

Думаю, что после реорганизации и распределения в марте на 6 независимых отраслей пошёл такой скачок. При этом, статус листинга на крупнейших мировых биржах не изменился. К тому же, после государственных антимонопольных санкций вроде бы перестали их "давить", акции только растут, есть смысл докупить.

answer answer