Max Chat
Company Analysis Lazydays Holdings, Inc.
1. Summary
Advantages
- Price (4.75 $) is less than fair price (5.16 $)
- Current debt level 54% is below 100% and has decreased over 5 years from 56.57%.
- The company's current efficiency (ROE=26.66%) is higher than the sector average (ROE=-22.88%)
Disadvantages
- Dividends (0%) are below the sector average (0%).
- The stock's return over the last year (0%) is lower than the sector average (0%).
Similar companies
2. Share price and performance
2.1. Share price
2.3. Market efficiency
| Lazydays Holdings, Inc. | Consumer Cyclical | Index | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 7 days | 0% | -5.7% | 0.1% |
| 90 days | 0% | -45.5% | 24.3% |
| 1 year | 0% | 0% | 11.7% |
LAZY vs Sector: Lazydays Holdings, Inc. has slightly underperformed the "Consumer Cyclical" sector by 0% over the past year.
LAZY vs Market: Lazydays Holdings, Inc. has significantly underperformed the market by -11.66% over the past year.
Stable price: LAZY is not significantly more volatile than the rest of the market on "NASDAQ" over the last 3 months, with typical variations of +/- 5% per week.
Long period: LAZY with weekly volatility of 0% over the past year.
3. Summary of the report
4. Fundamental Analysis
4.1. Stock price and price forecast
Below fair price: The current price (4.75 $) is lower than the fair price (5.16 $).
Price not significantly lower than the fair price: The current price (4.75 $) is slightly lower than the fair price by 8.6%.
4.2. P/E
P/E vs Sector: The company's P/E (2.33) is higher than that of the sector as a whole (0).
P/E vs Market: The company's P/E (2.33) is lower than that of the market as a whole (89.99).
4.2.1 P/E Similar companies
4.3. P/BV
P/BV vs Sector: The company's P/BV (0.6528) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (1.33).
P/BV vs Market: The company's P/BV (0.6528) is lower than that of the market as a whole (9.37).
4.3.1 P/BV Similar companies
4.4. P/S
P/S vs Sector: The company's P/S indicator (0.1166) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (9.74).
P/S vs Market: The company's P/S indicator (0.1166) is lower than that of the market as a whole (10.11).
4.4.1 P/S Similar companies
4.5. EV/Ebitda
EV/Ebitda vs Sector: The company's EV/Ebitda (5.09) is higher than that of the sector as a whole (-5.53).
EV/Ebitda vs Market: The company's EV/Ebitda (5.09) is lower than that of the market as a whole (51.19).
5. Profitability
5.1. Profitability and revenue
5.2. Earnings per share - EPS
5.3. Past profitability Net Income
Yield Trend: Negative and has fallen by -22.54% over the last 5 years.
Accelerating profitability: The return for the last year (0%) exceeds the average return for 5 years (-22.54%).
Profitability vs Sector: The return for the last year (0%) is lower than the return for the sector (0%).
5.4. ROE
ROE vs Sector: The company's ROE (26.66%) is higher than that of the sector as a whole (-22.88%).
ROE vs Market: The company's ROE (26.66%) is higher than that of the market as a whole (11.64%).
5.5. ROA
ROA vs Sector: The company's ROA (8.69%) is higher than that of the sector as a whole (-21.95%).
ROA vs Market: The company's ROA (8.69%) is higher than that of the market as a whole (6.89%).
5.6. ROIC
ROIC vs Sector: The company's ROIC (0%) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (0%).
ROIC vs Market: The company's ROIC (0%) is lower than that of the market as a whole (11.01%).
7. Dividends
7.1. Dividend yield vs Market
Low yield: The dividend yield of the company 0% is below the average for the sector '0%.
7.2. Stability and increase in payments
Unstable dividends: The company's dividend yield 0% has not been consistently paid over the past 7 years, DSI=0.
Weak dividend growth: The company's dividend yield 0% has been growing weakly or stagnant over the past 5 years. Growth over only 0 years.
7.3. Payout percentage
Dividend Coverage: Current payments from income (7.23%) are at an uncomfortable level.
Pay for your subscription
More functionality and data for company and portfolio analysis is available by subscription
