NYSE: BABA - Alibaba Group Holding Limited

Yield per half year: -1.2336%
Sector: Consumer Staples

Download the report: word Word , pdf PDF

1. Summary

Advantages

  • Positive review The stock's return over the last year (-14.19%) is higher than the sector average (-98.29%).
  • Positive review Current debt level 9.2% is below 100% and has decreased over 5 years from 17.51%.
  • Positive review The company's current efficiency (ROE=7.51%) is higher than the sector average (ROE=-153.63%)

Disadvantages

  • Negative review Price (74.46 $) is higher than fair price (35.65 $)
  • Negative review Dividends (1.3184%) are below the sector average (2.28%).

2. Share price and performance

2.1. Share price

2.2. News

2.3. Market efficiency

Alibaba Group Holding Limited Consumer Staples Index
7 days -4.4% -97.1% -3.2%
90 days 1.4% -97.3% -4.9%
1 year -14.2% -98.3% 10.5%

Positive review BABA vs Sector: Alibaba Group Holding Limited has outperformed the "Consumer Staples" sector by 84.11% over the past year.

Negative review BABA vs Market: Alibaba Group Holding Limited has significantly underperformed the market by -24.65% over the past year.

Positive review Stable price: BABA is not significantly more volatile than the rest of the market on "New York Stock Exchange" over the last 3 months, with typical variations of +/- 5% per week.

Long period: BABA with weekly volatility of -0.2728% over the past year.

3. Summary of the report

3.1. General

P/E: 21.5
P/S: 1.8015

3.2. Revenue

EPS 3.8
ROE 7.51%
ROA 4.22%
ROIC 4.91%
Ebitda margin 14.09%

4. Fundamental Analysis

4.1. Stock price and price forecast

The fair price is calculated taking into account the Central Bank refinancing rate and earnings per share (EPS)

Negative review Above fair price: The current price (74.46 $) is higher than the fair price (35.65 $).

Negative review Price is higher than fair: The current price (74.46 $) is 52.1% higher than the fair price.

4.2. P/E

Positive review P/E vs Sector: The company's P/E (21.5) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (40.73).

Positive review P/E vs Market: The company's P/E (21.5) is lower than that of the market as a whole (64.8).

4.2.1 P/E Similar companies

4.3. P/BV

Positive review P/BV vs Sector: The company's P/BV (1.3936) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (12.85).

Positive review P/BV vs Market: The company's P/BV (1.3936) is lower than that of the market as a whole (21.87).

4.3.1 P/BV Similar companies

4.4. P/S

Positive review P/S vs Sector: The company's P/S indicator (1.8015) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (5.25).

Positive review P/S vs Market: The company's P/S indicator (1.8015) is lower than that of the market as a whole (8.08).

4.4.1 P/S Similar companies

4.5. EV/Ebitda

Positive review EV/Ebitda vs Sector: The company's EV/Ebitda (12.53) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (26.32).

Negative review EV/Ebitda vs Market: The company's EV/Ebitda (12.53) is higher than that of the market as a whole (11.83).

5. Profitability

5.1. Profitability and revenue

5.2. Earnings per share - EPS

5.3. Past profitability Ebitda

Negative review Yield Trend: Negative and has fallen by -4.67% over the last 5 years.

Positive review Accelerating profitability: The return for the last year (0%) exceeds the average return for 5 years (-4.67%).

Positive review Profitability vs Sector: The return for the last year (0%) exceeds the return for the sector (-5.62%).

5.4. ROE

Positive review ROE vs Sector: The company's ROE (7.51%) is higher than that of the sector as a whole (-153.63%).

Positive review ROE vs Market: The company's ROE (7.51%) is higher than that of the market as a whole (-14.5%).

5.5. ROA

Negative review ROA vs Sector: The company's ROA (4.22%) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (10.95%).

Negative review ROA vs Market: The company's ROA (4.22%) is lower than that of the market as a whole (6.81%).

5.6. ROIC

Negative review ROIC vs Sector: The company's ROIC (4.91%) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (13.37%).

Negative review ROIC vs Market: The company's ROIC (4.91%) is lower than that of the market as a whole (8.49%).

6. Finance

6.1. Assets and debt

Positive review Debt level: (9.2%) is quite low in relation to assets.

Positive review Debt reduction: over 5 years, the debt has decreased from 17.51% to 9.2%.

Negative review Excess of debt: The debt is not covered by net income, percentage 221.61%.

6.2. Profit growth and share price

7. Dividends

7.1. Dividend yield vs Market

Negative review Low yield: The dividend yield of the company 1.3184% is below the average for the sector '2.28%.

7.2. Stability and increase in payments

Positive review Dividend stability: The company's dividend yield 1.3184% has been steadily paid over the past 7 years, DSI=0.83.

Negative review Weak dividend growth: The company's dividend yield 1.3184% has been growing weakly or stagnant over the past 5 years. Growth over only 1 year.

7.3. Payout percentage

Positive review Dividend Coverage: Current payments from income (31.31%) are at a comfortable level.

8. Insider trades

8.1. Insider trading

Positive review Insider Buying Exceeds insider sales by 100% over the last 3 months.

8.2. Latest transactions

No insider transactions have been recorded yet

9. Stocks forum Alibaba Group Holding Limited

9.1. Latest comments

26 June 11:57

Думаю, что после реорганизации и распределения в марте на 6 независимых отраслей пошёл такой скачок. При этом, статус листинга на крупнейших мировых биржах не изменился. К тому же, после государственных антимонопольных санкций вроде бы перестали их "давить", акции только растут, есть смысл докупить.

answer answer