Company Analysis Norwegian Cruise Line
1. Summary
Advantages
- Price (18.94 $) is less than fair price (25.4 $)
- The stock's return over the last year (-23.87%) is higher than the sector average (-23.9%).
- The company's current efficiency (ROE=105.46%) is higher than the sector average (ROE=23.18%)
Disadvantages
- Dividends (0%) are below the sector average (1.58%).
- Current debt level 65.6% has increased over 5 years from 40.77%.
Similar companies
2. Share price and performance
2.1. Share price
2.3. Market efficiency
| Norwegian Cruise Line | Consumer Discretionary | Index | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 7 days | 3.8% | 0% | 0.3% |
| 90 days | -22.1% | -31.5% | 3.6% |
| 1 year | -23.9% | -23.9% | 14.1% |
NCLH vs Sector: Norwegian Cruise Line has outperformed the "Consumer Discretionary" sector by 0.0297% over the past year.
NCLH vs Market: Norwegian Cruise Line has significantly underperformed the market by -38% over the past year.
Stable price: NCLH is not significantly more volatile than the rest of the market on "New York Stock Exchange" over the last 3 months, with typical variations of +/- 5% per week.
Long period: NCLH with weekly volatility of -0.4591% over the past year.
3. Summary of the report
5. Fundamental Analysis
5.1. Stock price and price forecast
Below fair price: The current price (18.94 $) is lower than the fair price (25.4 $).
Price significantly below the fair price: The current price (18.94 $) is 34.1% lower than the fair price.
5.2. P/E
P/E vs Sector: The company's P/E (14.57) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (32.68).
P/E vs Market: The company's P/E (14.57) is lower than that of the market as a whole (56.03).
5.2.1 P/E Similar companies
5.3. P/BV
P/BV vs Sector: The company's P/BV (9.3) is higher than that of the sector as a whole (4.09).
P/BV vs Market: The company's P/BV (9.3) is lower than that of the market as a whole (17.56).
5.3.1 P/BV Similar companies
5.5. P/S
P/S vs Sector: The company's P/S indicator (1.4) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (2.39).
P/S vs Market: The company's P/S indicator (1.4) is lower than that of the market as a whole (27.86).
5.5.1 P/S Similar companies
5.5. EV/Ebitda
EV/Ebitda vs Sector: The company's EV/Ebitda (10.5) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (22.11).
EV/Ebitda vs Market: The company's EV/Ebitda (10.5) is lower than that of the market as a whole (32.46).
6. Profitability
6.1. Profitability and revenue
6.2. Earnings per share - EPS
6.3. Past profitability Net Income
Yield Trend: Negative and has fallen by -24.54% over the last 5 years.
Accelerating profitability: The return for the last year (0%) exceeds the average return for 5 years (-24.54%).
Profitability vs Sector: The return for the last year (0%) exceeds the return for the sector (-10.86%).
6.4. ROE
ROE vs Sector: The company's ROE (105.46%) is higher than that of the sector as a whole (23.18%).
ROE vs Market: The company's ROE (105.46%) is higher than that of the market as a whole (38.94%).
6.6. ROA
ROA vs Sector: The company's ROA (4.61%) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (10.12%).
ROA vs Market: The company's ROA (4.61%) is lower than that of the market as a whole (11.33%).
6.6. ROIC
ROIC vs Sector: The company's ROIC (-20.04%) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (7.75%).
ROIC vs Market: The company's ROIC (-20.04%) is lower than that of the market as a whole (10.1%).
8. Dividends
8.1. Dividend yield vs Market
Low yield: The dividend yield of the company 0% is below the average for the sector '1.58%.
8.2. Stability and increase in payments
Unstable dividends: The company's dividend yield 0% has not been consistently paid over the past 7 years, DSI=0.
Weak dividend growth: The company's dividend yield 0% has been growing weakly or stagnant over the past 5 years. Growth over only 0 years.
8.3. Payout percentage
Dividend Coverage: Current payments from income (208.73%) are at an uncomfortable level.
Pay for your subscription
More functionality and data for company and portfolio analysis is available by subscription
Based on sources: porti.ru
