Invesco S&P 500® Equal Weight Financials ETF


Добавить в список отслеживания Добавить в список отслеживания
Добавить в портфель Добавить в портфель

Основные параметры

Цена последней сделки 55.3
Код ценной бумаги RYF
Полное наименование Invesco S&P 500® Equal Weight Financials ETF
Объем 255400000000
Изм за день, % 0.02
Комиссия 0.40
Дата основания Nov 07. 2006
Ссылка ссылка
Тип актива Equity
Индекс S&P Equal Weight Index Financials
Регион North America
Средний P/E 12.04
Дивиденды 1.99
5 летняя доходность 128.55
3 летняя доходность 30.85
Годовая доходность 27.91
Бета 1.25
Валюта usd

Топ эмитентов

Эмитент Доля, % P/BV P/S P/E EV/Ebitda
SVB 1.98 3.47 7.24 23.03
People's United Financial 1.91 0.99 4.06 13.81
Regions 1.81 1.2 4 20.03
First Republic Bank 1.77 2.81 7.55 28.36
Goldman Sachs 1.77 1.35 2.66 12.91
Capital One Financial 1.77 1 3.02 23.19
Comerica Incorporated 1.75 1.24 3.99 20.83
KeyCorp 1.74 1.22 3.44 15.81
Zions Bancorporation 1.73 1.23 3.74 18.12
Raymond James Financial 1.71 2.18 2.02 18.94
Fifth Third Bancorp 1.7 1.23 3.92 19.81
Wells Fargo 1.69 0.91 2.56 88.22
Invesco 1.68 0.99 1.67 19.84 10.48
Charles Schwab 1.68 2.4 9.94 29.11
M&T Bank 1.68 1.3 3.77 15.19

Похожие ETF

Описание Invesco S&P 500® Equal Weight Financials ETF

This ETF focuses exclusively on the financial sector of the U.S. economy, making it one option available to investors looking to overweight banks and other financial institutions in their portfolio. RYF distinguishes itself from other broad-based financial ETFs by its weighting methodology. Unlike XLF and other cap-weighted products, RYF is linked to an equal-weighted index--meaning that each component receives an equivalent allocation in the fund upon rebalancing. As a result, RYF maintains considerably lower concentration than most financial ETFs, as exposure is spread around evenly as opposed to being concentrated among a handful of mega cap stocks. For investors who believe that equal weighting represents a more logical approach to asset allocation, RYF may be a better way to gain access to the U.S. financial sector. The downside is in the price; this type of exposure results in a considerably higher price tag than the low cost XLF or FFL.