NASDAQ: LULU - Lululemon Athletica

Yield per half year: +19.12%
Sector: Consumer Discretionary

Company Analysis Lululemon Athletica

Download the report: word Word pdf PDF

1. Summary

Advantages

  • The company's current efficiency (ROE=36.63%) is higher than the sector average (ROE=-23.28%)

Disadvantages

  • Price (403.8 $) is higher than fair price (151.39 $)
  • Dividends (0%) are below the sector average (0.3972%).
  • The stock's return over the last year (7.99%) is lower than the sector average (24.56%).
  • Current debt level 19.79% has increased over 5 years from 0%.

Similar companies

Marriott International

Ross Stores

Copart

eBay

2. Share price and performance

2.1. Share price

2.2. News

2.3. Market efficiency

Lululemon Athletica Consumer Discretionary Index
7 days 49.3% -12.2% 5.4%
90 days 42.3% 7.7% 15.1%
1 year 8% 24.6% 41.1%

LULU vs Sector: Lululemon Athletica has significantly underperformed the "Consumer Discretionary" sector by -16.58% over the past year.

LULU vs Market: Lululemon Athletica has significantly underperformed the market by -33.1% over the past year.

Stable price: LULU is not significantly more volatile than the rest of the market on "NASDAQ" over the last 3 months, with typical variations of +/- 5% per week.

Long period: LULU with weekly volatility of 0.1536% over the past year.

3. Summary of the report

3.1. General

P/E: 39.51
P/S: 6.37

3.2. Revenue

EPS 12.2
ROE 36.63%
ROA 21.86%
ROIC 27.95%
Ebitda margin 26.89%

4. Fundamental Analysis

4.1. Stock price and price forecast

The fair price is calculated taking into account the Central Bank refinancing rate and earnings per share (EPS)

Above fair price: The current price (403.8 $) is higher than the fair price (151.39 $).

Price is higher than fair: The current price (403.8 $) is 62.5% higher than the fair price.

4.2. P/E

P/E vs Sector: The company's P/E (39.51) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (40.54).

P/E vs Market: The company's P/E (39.51) is lower than that of the market as a whole (48.11).

4.2.1 P/E Similar companies

4.3. P/BV

P/BV vs Sector: The company's P/BV (14.47) is higher than that of the sector as a whole (0.4319).

P/BV vs Market: The company's P/BV (14.47) is higher than that of the market as a whole (3.1).

4.3.1 P/BV Similar companies

4.4. P/S

P/S vs Sector: The company's P/S indicator (6.37) is higher than that of the sector as a whole (3.79).

P/S vs Market: The company's P/S indicator (6.37) is lower than that of the market as a whole (10.14).

4.4.1 P/S Similar companies

4.5. EV/Ebitda

EV/Ebitda vs Sector: The company's EV/Ebitda (23.35) is higher than that of the sector as a whole (17.81).

EV/Ebitda vs Market: The company's EV/Ebitda (23.35) is higher than that of the market as a whole (19.27).

5. Profitability

5.1. Profitability and revenue

5.2. Earnings per share - EPS

5.3. Past profitability Net Income

Yield Trend: Rising and has grown by 44.08% over the last 5 years.

Accelerating profitability: The return for the last year (81.35%) exceeds the average return for 5 years (44.08%).

Profitability vs Sector: The return for the last year (81.35%) exceeds the return for the sector (8.28%).

5.4. ROE

ROE vs Sector: The company's ROE (36.63%) is higher than that of the sector as a whole (-23.28%).

ROE vs Market: The company's ROE (36.63%) is higher than that of the market as a whole (10.47%).

5.5. ROA

ROA vs Sector: The company's ROA (21.86%) is higher than that of the sector as a whole (4.21%).

ROA vs Market: The company's ROA (21.86%) is higher than that of the market as a whole (6.4%).

5.6. ROIC

ROIC vs Sector: The company's ROIC (27.95%) is higher than that of the sector as a whole (9.46%).

ROIC vs Market: The company's ROIC (27.95%) is higher than that of the market as a whole (10.79%).

6. Finance

6.1. Assets and debt

Debt level: (19.79%) is quite low in relation to assets.

Increasing debt: over 5 years, the debt has increased from 0% to 19.79%.

Debt Covering: The debt is covered by 90.52% from net profit.

6.2. Profit growth and share price

7. Dividends

7.1. Dividend yield vs Market

Low yield: The dividend yield of the company 0% is below the average for the sector '0.3972%.

7.2. Stability and increase in payments

Unstable dividends: The company's dividend yield 0% has not been consistently paid over the past 7 years, DSI=0.

Weak dividend growth: The company's dividend yield 0% has been growing weakly or stagnant over the past 5 years. Growth over only 0 years.

7.3. Payout percentage

Dividend Coverage: Current payments from income (2.8%) are at an uncomfortable level.

8. Insider trades

8.1. Insider trading

Insider Buying Exceeds insider sales by 100% over the last 3 months.

8.2. Latest transactions

Transaction date Insider Type Price Volume Quantity
26.09.2024 NICOLE NEUBURGER
Officer
Purchase 269.59 131 021 486
27.03.2024 MORFITT MARTHA A M
Director
Purchase 389 1 167 000 3 000
26.03.2024 MORFITT MARTHA A M
Director
Purchase 389.29 272 503 700
06.09.2023 Choe Michelle Sun
Chief Product Officer
Sale 401 11 220 400 27 981
06.09.2023 Choe Michelle Sun
Chief Product Officer
Purchase 145.02 2 738 410 18 883

Pay for your subscription

More functionality and data for company and portfolio analysis is available by subscription

9. Stocks forum Lululemon Athletica